Personal tools

You are here: Home / Plan

Plan

HOME

1 ABOUT ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Section Line
Section coordination by J. Ballé-Béganton11, M. Philippe11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from R. Mongruel5, N. Beaumont8, T. Hooper8, H. Levrel5, P. Somerfield8, E. Thiébaut10, M. Charles1, L. Friedrich9 and W. Dodds9

Bullet point blue 1.1 WHY an ecosystem services approach in marine and coastal areas?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.1.1 Global biodiversity decline
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.1.2 Nature’s worth
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.1.3 Biodiversity, sustainable development and ecosystem services: keywords in governance

Bullet point blue 1.2 WHAT is the Ecosystem Services Approach?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.2.1 Ecosystem services assessment and valuation
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.2.2 What are ecosystem services?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.2.3 Marine ecosystem services
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 1.2.3.1 Marine supporting services
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 1.2.3.2 Marine regulating services
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 1.2.3.3 Marine provisioning services
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 1.2.3.4 Marine cultural services
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.2.4 Drivers of change of ecosystem services
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.2.5 Managing pressures and not ecosystem services

Bullet point blue 1.3 The HOW: from academic model to practical management tool
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.3.1 Academic milestones of the Ecosystem Services Approach
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.3.2 Existing ecosystem services frameworks
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.3.3 Is ecosystem services valuation all about money?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.3.4 Ecosystem service assessment in marine management around the world
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 1.3.5 Limitations

2 SET THE FRAMEWORK OF THE ASSESSMENT AND THE VALUATION
Section Line
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from R. Mongruel5, N. Beaumont8, T. Hooper8, H. Levrel5, P. Somerfield8, E. Thiébaut10, M. Charles1, L. Pendleton11, L. Friedrich9 and W. Dodds9

Bullet point blue 2.1 Why, who and what
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 2.1.1 A social process
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 2.1.2 Work in partnership
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 2.1.3 Stakeholder engagement

Bullet point blue 2.2 Visualisation and communication

Bullet point blue 2.3 Running a structured decision making process: the triage process
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 2.3.1 Preliminary to triage: is an ecosystem services assessment the most appropriate approach?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 2.3.2 The three sequences of triage
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 2.3.2.1 Triage sequence 1.1: For which purposes is a valuation of marine ecosystem services needed in the area?
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 2.3.2.2 Triage sequence 1.2: What are the most important policy issues in relation to marine ecosystem services in the area?
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 2.3.2.3 Triage sequence 1.3: What parts of the marine social-ecological system are concerned by these policy issues?
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 2.3.2.4 Triage sequence 2.1: What is the potential for the status or value of ecological functions and services to change?
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 2.3.2.5 Triage sequence 2.2: How does the envisaged management intervention influence these changes?
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 2.3.2.6 Triage sequence 2.3: Which other factors do affect the status or value of the considered functions and services?
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 2.3.2.7 Triage sequence 3.1: Which metrics would be meaningful as regards the factors of change to be considered?
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 2.3.2.8 Triage sequence 3.2: Which methods and tools could be used to obtain such metrics?
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 2.3.2.9 Triage sequence 3.3: Is the envisaged valuation method feasible?

Bullet point blue 2.4 Recommendations
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 2.4.1 Recommendations for the stakeholder engagement
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 2.4.2 Recommendations for implementing the process with the triage
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 2.4.3 Recommendations for the assessment framework

3 ASSESS AND VALUE
Section Line
Section coordination by J. Ballé-Béganton11, M. Philippe11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from R. Mongruel5, N. Beaumont8, T. Hooper8, H. Levrel5, P. Somerfield8, E. Thiébaut10 and M. Charles1

Bullet point blue 3.1 Building a common language: definitions and nomenclatures
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.1.1 Natural habitats, ecological functions and marine ecosystem services
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.1.2 Do natural habitat, ecological functions and ecosystem services always match?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.1.3 Disentangling complexity of the relationships between ecosystems, their features and the provided services
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.1.4 Main categories of services provided by marine ecosystems
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.1.5 Nomenclatures for stakeholders and management bodies
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.1.6 Indicators for the assessment of marine ecosystem services
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.1.7 Concept of values

Bullet point blue 3.2 List of assessment and valuation methods

Bullet point blue 3.3 Ecological assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.3.1 Habitat mapping: the EUNIS nomenclature
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.3.2 Habitats-functions-services relationship assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.3.3 Sensitivity assessment

Bullet point blue 3.4 Social science methods
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.4.1 Surveys, interviews and focus groups
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.4.2 Multi-criteria analysis
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.4.3 Behavioural observation

Bullet point blue 3.5 Economic methods
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.5.1 Revealed preference: Travel costs method
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.5.2 Revealed preferences: Hedonic pricing
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.5.3 Revealed preferences: Averting-behaviour methods
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.5.4 Stated preferences: Contingent valuation and Contingent behaviour
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.5.5 Stated preferences: Choice experiment
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.5.6 Stated preferences: Benefit transfer
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.5.7 Ecosystem accounting

Bullet point blue 3.6 Civic valuation

Bullet point blue 3.7 Ecosystem benefit indicators and biophysical ranking methods

Bullet point blue 3.8 Methods using cost as a proxy for value

Bullet point blue 3.9 Cross-methods
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.9.1 Natural capital project InVEST
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.9.2 Bayesian belief networks
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.9.3 System dynamic modelling
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 3.9.4 Companion modelling for common pool resources

4 BUILD SCENARIOS
Section Line
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from J. Herry7, W. Dodds9, M. Philippe11 and A. Winder3

Bullet point blue 4.1 Scenarios, a tool to anticipate and consider the future
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.1.1 What do we mean by “scenarios”?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.1.2 Different types of scenarios
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 4.1.2.1 Exploratory scenario: What might happen?
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 4.1.2.2 Normative scenario: How can a specific target be reached?
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 4.1.2.3 Predictive scenario: what will happen?

Bullet point blue 4.2 Building scenarios, why and how?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.2.1 PHASE 1: Illustrating the system being studied including natural processes and human activities
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.2.2 PHASE 2: Identifying drivers of change in the case study ecosystem
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.2.3 PHASE 3: Establishing the key variables and associating them to explore and build the scenarios
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.2.4 PHASE 4: Selecting and developing the format of the scenarios with stakeholders
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.2.5 PHASE 5: Using scenarios to create discussion on management options
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.2.6 In brief: List of tools that can be used for each phase of the scenario building process

Bullet point blue 4.3 Toolbox for scenario building
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.1 Interviews with stakeholders and/or experts
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.2 Stakeholders matrix
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.3 BRAINSTORMING
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.4 DELPHI
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.5 REGNIER’S ABACUS
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.6 TOOLS TO REPRESENT THE SYSTEM, PRESENT AND COMBINE INFORMATION, SYNTHESIZE KNOWLEDGE
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.7 ARDI METHOD
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.8 DPSIR
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.9 PESTLE AND MATRICES TO CLASSIFY THE POSSIBLE CHANGES
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.10 BAYESIAN ANALYSIS
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.11 BACKCASTING
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 4.3.12 INVEST



5 CASE STUDIES
Section Line

Bullet point blue 5.1 NORTH DEVON
Section coordination by J. Ballé-Béganton11, M. Philippe11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from O. Langmead6, T. Hooper8, C. Griffiths6, N. Beaumont8 and S. Guilbert3

Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.1.1 Site description
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.1.2 Focus of study
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.1.3 Key stakeholders and their involvement
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.1.4 Method to determine which ecosystem services were the focus
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.1.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment method and key results
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.1.6 Scenario process
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 5.1.6.1 Scenario phase 1: Characterising the North Devon Case Study area
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 5.1.6.2 Scenario phase 2: Identifying the scenario themes using stakeholder consultation
Bullet point blue   Title level 4 5.1.6.2.1 Final scenario 1: Marine Conservation Zone designation
Bullet point blue   Title level 4 5.1.6.2.2 Final scenario 2: Aggregate extraction
Bullet point blue   Title level 4 5.1.6.2.3 Final scenario 3: Aquaculture development
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 5.1.6.3 Scenario phase 3: Establishing the key variables and developing pressure maps
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 5.1.6.4 Scenario phase 4: Developing and parameterizing the socio-ecological model
Bullet point blue   Title level 3 5.1.6.5 Scenario phase 5: Scenario modelling
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.1.7 Conclusions

Bullet point blue 5.2 POOLE HARBOUR
Section coordination by J. Ballé-Béganton11, M. Philippe11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from A. Brocklesby4, K. Buchan4, W. Dodds9, T. Hooper8, L. Friedrich9, N. Beaumont8 and C. Griffiths6

Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.2.1 Site Description
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.2.2 Main Activities and Uses
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.2.3 Governance Arrangements
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.2.4 Key stakeholders and their involvement
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.2.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.2.6 Methods and Key Results

Bullet point blue 5.3 PLYMOUTH SOUND TO FOWEY
Section coordination by J. Ballé-Béganton11, M. Philippe11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from N. Smith9, P. Hoskin2, W. Dodds9, T. Hooper8, L. Friedrich9, N. Beaumont8 and C. Griffiths6

Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.3.1 Site description
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.3.2 Main Activities and Uses
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.3.3 Governance Arrangements
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.3.4 Key stakeholders and their involvement
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.3.5 Selecting the Ecosystem Services Assessment Focus
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.3.6 Scenarios for Assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.3.7 Methods and Results
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.3.8 Governance mapping to support the assessment


Bullet point blue 5.4 GOLFE NORMAND-BRETON
Section coordination by J. Ballé-Béganton11, M. Philippe11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from K. Dedieu1, F. Morisseau1, R. Mongruel5, E. Thiébaut10, J.Schoenn10, P. Cabral11, F. Daurès5, E. Foucher5, JC. Martin5, P. Le Mao5, C. Rollet5, H. Levrel5 and S. Girard5

Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.4.1 Site description
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.4.2 Main Activities and Uses
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.4.3 Governance Arrangements
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.4.4 Aims of the Ecosystem Services Assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.4.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment Methods and Results
Bullet point blue   Title level 4 5.4.5.1 Linking Habitats, Functions and Services
Bullet point blue   Title level 4 5.4.5.2 Golfe Normand-Breton: InVEST
Bullet point blue   Title level 4 5.4.5.3 Golfe Normand-Breton: Ecosystem accounting
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.4.6 Links between the Ecosystem Services Assessment and the scenarios
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.4.7 Aims of scenario building process?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.4.8 Detailed description of the scenarios approach
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.4.9 Scenario description
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.4.10 Use of scenarios outputs for management
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.4.11 Scenarios experience sharing

Bullet point blue 5.5 PARC NATUREL MARIN D'IROISE
Section coordination by J. Ballé-Béganton11, M. Philippe11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from A. Vanhoutte-Brunier1, A. Marzin5, M. Laurans5, O. Guyader5, D. Davoult10, R. Mongruel5, P. Le Nilliot1and D. Vaschalde1

Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.1 Site description
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.2 Main activities and uses
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.3 Governance Arrangements
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.4 Aims of the Ecosystem Services Assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment Methods
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.6 Links between the Ecosystem Services Assessment and the scenarios
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.7 Aims of scenario building process?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.8 Detailed description of the scenarios approach
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.9 Advantages and disadvantages of the scenarios methods used?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.10 Scenario description
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.11 Use of scenarios outputs for management
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.5.12 Scenarios experience sharing

Bullet point blue 5.6 PARC NATUREL REGIONAL DU GOLFE DU MORBIHAN
Section coordination by J. Ballé-Béganton11, M. Philippe11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from J. Herry7, M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11, R. Pasco7, B. Angst11, M. Urien7, D. Bailly11, M. Cassé7

Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.1 Site description
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.2 Main Activities and Uses
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.3 Governance Arrangements
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.4 Key stakeholders and their involvement
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.5 Aims of the Ecosystem Services Assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.6 Ecosystem Services Assessment Methods and Results
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.7 Links between the Ecosystem Services Assessment and the scenarios
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.8 Aims of the scenario building process?
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.9 Detailed description of the scenarios approach
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.10 Scenario description
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.11 Use of scenarios outputs for management
Bullet point blue   Title level 2 5.6.12 Scenarios experience sharing


1 Agence des Aires Marines Protégées
2 Cornwall Council
3 Devon County Council / Devon Maritime Forum
4 Dorset County Council/Dorset Coast Forum
5 Ifremer
6 Marine Biological Association of the UK
7 Parc Naturel Régional du Golfe du Morbihan
8 Plymouth Marine Laboratory
9 Plymouth University
10 Station Biologique de Roscoff – Université Pierre et Marie Curie
11 Université de Bretagne Occidentale – Brest/ UMR AMURE

PORTLET Navigation Plan Resources Glossary Help