Personal tools

You are here: Home / Case studies

5. Case studies

Navigation Arrows Previous NextPreviousNext

This section presents the implementation of the Ecosystem Services Approach in six case studies including, when relevant to the local context, the implementation of the triage process, of ecosystem services methods and of scenario building methods.

Click on map to access the different case studies.

5 0  Case studies map

North DevonNorth DevonPoole HarbourPoole HarbourPlymouth to FoweyPlymouth to FoweyGolfe Normand BretonGolfe Normand BretonGolfe Normand BretonPNMIPNMIGolfe du MorbihanGolfe du Morbihan

The work presented here has been developed in the six following case studies of the VALMER Interreg 4A Channel project (2012-2015).

 

Section outline

5 CASE STUDIES
Section Line

Bullet point blue5.1 NORTH DEVON
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from O. Langmead6, T. Hooper8, C. Griffiths6, N. Beaumont8 and S. Guilbert3

Bullet point blue   Title level 25.1.1 Site description
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.1.2 Focus of study
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.1.3 Key stakeholders and their involvement
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.1.4 Method to determine which ecosystem services were the focus
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.1.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment method and key results
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.1.6 Scenario process
Bullet point blue   Title level 35.1.6.1 Scenario phase 1: Characterising the North Devon Case Study area
Bullet point blue   Title level 35.1.6.2 Scenario phase 2: Identifying the scenario themes using stakeholder consultation
Bullet point blue   Title level 45.1.6.2.1 Final scenario 1: Marine Conservation Zone designation
Bullet point blue   Title level 45.1.6.2.2 Final scenario 2: Aggregate extraction
Bullet point blue   Title level 45.1.6.2.3 Final scenario 3: Aquaculture development
Bullet point blue   Title level 35.1.6.3 Scenario phase 3: Establishing the key variables and developing pressure maps
Bullet point blue   Title level 35.1.6.4 Scenario phase 4: Developing and parameterizing the socio-ecological model
Bullet point blue   Title level 35.1.6.5 Scenario phase 5: Scenario modelling
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.1.7 Conclusions

Bullet point blue5.2 POOLE HARBOUR
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from A. Brocklesby4, K. Buchan4, W. Dodds9, T. Hooper8, L. Friedrich9, N. Beaumont8 and C. Griffiths6

Bullet point blue   Title level 25.2.1 Site Description
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.2.2 Main Activities and Uses
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.2.3 Governance Arrangements
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.2.4 Key stakeholders and their involvement
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.2.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.2.6 Methods and Key Results

Bullet point blue5.3 PLYMOUTH SOUND TO FOWEY
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from N. Smith9, P. Hoskin2, W. Dodds9, T. Hooper8, L. Friedrich9, N. Beaumont8 and C. Griffiths6

Bullet point blue   Title level 25.3.1 Site description
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.3.2 Main Activities and Uses
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.3.3 Governance Arrangements
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.3.4 Key stakeholders and their involvement
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.3.5 Selecting the Ecosystem Services Assessment Focus
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.3.6 Scenarios for Assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.3.7 Methods and Results
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.3.8 Governance mapping to support the assessment


Bullet point blue5.4 GOLFE NORMAND-BRETON
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from K. Dedieu1, F. Morisseau1, R. Mongruel5 and E. Thiébaut10

Bullet point blue   Title level 25.4.1 Site description
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.4.2 Main Activities and Uses
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.4.3 Governance Arrangements
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.4.4 Aims of the Ecosystem Services Assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.4.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment Methods and Results
Bullet point blue   Title level 45.4.5.1 Linking Habitats, Functions and Services
Bullet point blue   Title level 45.4.5.2 Golfe Normand-Breton: InVEST
Bullet point blue   Title level 45.4.5.3 Golfe Normand-Breton: Ecosystem accounting
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.4.6 Links between the Ecosystem Services Assessment and the scenarios
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.4.7 Aims of scenario building process?
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.4.8 Detailed description of the scenarios approach
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.4.9 Scenario description
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.4.10 Use of scenarios outputs for management
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.4.11 Scenarios experience sharing

Bullet point blue5.5 PARC NATUREL MARIN D'IROISE
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from A. Vanhoutte-Brunier1, P. Le Nilliot1, R. Mongruel5, A. Marzin5, M. Laurans5, O. Guyader5, D. Davoult10 and D. Vaschalde1

Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.1 Site description
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.2 Main activities and uses
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.3 Governance Arrangements
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.4 Aims of the Ecosystem Services Assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment Methods
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.6 Links between the Ecosystem Services Assessment and the scenarios
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.7 Aims of scenario building process?
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.8 Detailed description of the scenarios approach
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.9 Advantages and disadvantages of the scenarios methods used?
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.10 Scenario description
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.11 Use of scenarios outputs for management
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.5.12 Scenarios experience sharing

Bullet point blue5.6 PARC NATUREL REGIONAL DU GOLFE DU MORBIHAN
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from J. Herry7 and M. Philippe11

Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.1 Site description
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.2 Main Activities and Uses
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.3 Governance Arrangements
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.4 Key stakeholders and their involvement
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.5 Aims of the Ecosystem Services Assessment
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.6 Ecosystem Services Assessment Methods and Results
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.7 Links between the Ecosystem Services Assessment and the scenarios
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.8 Aims of the scenario building process?
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.9 Detailed description of the scenarios approach
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.10 Scenario description
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.11 Use of scenarios outputs for management
Bullet point blue   Title level 25.6.12 Scenarios experience sharing


1 Agence des Aires Marines Protégées
2 Cornwall Council
3 Devon County Council / Devon Maritime Forum
4 Dorset County Council/Dorset Coast Forum
5 Ifremer
6 Marine Biological Association of the UK
7 Parc Naturel Régional du Golfe du Morbihan
8 Plymouth Marine Laboratory
9 Plymouth University
10 Station Biologique de Roscoff – Université Pierre et Marie Curie
11 Université de Bretagne Occidentale – Brest/ UMR AMURE

PORTLET NavigationPlanResourcesGlossaryHelp